1956 AC Ace vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Ace weights approximately 84 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (81 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Ace | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |
