1956 AC Ace vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (143 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 166 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (174 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1996 Rover 200 | |
| Make | AC | Rover |
| Model | Ace | 200 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
