1956 AC Ace vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 336 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ace | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2210 mm |
