1956 AC Ace vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Ace weights approximately 216 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | AC | Lotus |
| Model | Ace | Emme |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2770 mm |
