1956 AC Ace vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv weights approximately 356 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (214 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1956 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Ace | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1360 mm |
