1956 AC Ace vs. 2000 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1956 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2000 Chevrolet S-10 | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ace | S-10 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3130 mm |
