1956 AC Ace vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 151 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan. 2000 Lada Tarzan has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1956 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Tarzan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
| Make | AC | Lada |
| Model | Ace | Tarzan |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1499 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 77 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1045 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
