1956 AC Ace vs. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace (89 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 821 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace (226 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2444 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 226 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1960 mm |