1956 AC Ace vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 771 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Ace | XJR |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 525 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |