1956 AC Ace vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 68 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2003 Ford Ka | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Ace | Ka |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 962 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 40 L |
