1956 AC Ace vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1353 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 373 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 95 L |