1956 AC Ace vs. 2006 MG ZR
To start off, 2006 MG ZR is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZR (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZR weights approximately 201 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2006 MG ZR | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Ace | ZR |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 123 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |