1956 AC Ace vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 812 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Ace | CTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 343 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 66 L |