1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Acura RL
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace. 2009 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1956 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2009 Acura RL | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Ace | RL |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 367 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 73 L |