1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac DTS (292 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 741 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac DTS (391 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2009 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Ace | DTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 391 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |