1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ace | Impala |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 234 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |
