1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Ace | Epica |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
