1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Ace | UTE |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
