1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lada 21 (80 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (120 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | AC | Lada |
Model | Ace | 21 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 120 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 43 L |