1956 AC Ace vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | AC | Land Rover |
Model | Ace | LR2 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 234 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |