1956 AC Ace vs. 2010 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2010 Renault Trafic is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Trafic.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Trafic (241 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2010 Renault Trafic | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Ace | Trafic |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |
