1956 AC Ace vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1647 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | E-350 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 474 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2541 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2126 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 125 L |