1956 AC Ace vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Ace | XF |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
