1956 AC Ace vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 152 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Ace | 2 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 133 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 43 L |