1956 AC Ace vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 636 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Ace | ATS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 353 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |