1956 AC Ace vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Ace | XTS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2831 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 76 L |
