1956 AC Ace vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1107 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Ace | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2001 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |