1956 AC Ace vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Ace weights approximately 74 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1956 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | AC | Smart |
| Model | Ace | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 33 L |
