1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Volvo PV weights approximately 525 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Aceca-Bristol | PV |
Year Released | 1956 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |