1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | AC | Volvo |
| Model | Aceca-Bristol | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2850 mm |
