1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca-Bristol | 62 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 79 L |