1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1964 Toyota Crown is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 410 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Aceca-Bristol | Crown |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2599 cc |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |
