1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1976 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1976 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Bluebird. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 210 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 167 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1956 AC Aceca-Bristol 1976 Nissan Bluebird
Make AC Nissan
Model Aceca-Bristol Bluebird
Year Released 1956 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 125 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 965 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2660 mm