1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca-Bristol | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4690 mm |