1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1995 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 335 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1995 Daewoo Brougham | |
| Make | AC | Daewoo |
| Model | Aceca-Bristol | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |
