1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1998 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Windstar is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Windstar weights approximately 725 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1998 Ford Windstar | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca-Bristol | Windstar |
Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1920 mm |