1956 AC Aceca-Bristol vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol.
Because 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca-Bristol. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca-Bristol | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca-Bristol | Windstar |
Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3066 mm |