1956 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 216 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Aceca (168 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 1956 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | AC | Jeep |
| Model | Aceca | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2040 mm |
