1956 AC Aceca vs. 1950 Buick 40
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 1950 Buick 40 | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | 40 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4065 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3090 mm |