1956 AC Aceca vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 DKW F 89 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | AC | DKW |
Model | Aceca | F 89 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |