1956 AC Aceca vs. 1952 Allard Safari
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 586 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 1952 Allard Safari | |
Make | AC | Allard |
Model | Aceca | Safari |
Year Released | 1956 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 81 L |