1956 AC Aceca vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 1956 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Aceca weights approximately 109 kg more than 1954 Saab 92B.
Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1954 Saab 92B | |
| Make | AC | Saab |
| Model | Aceca | 92B |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
