1956 AC Aceca vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 220 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | AC | DKW |
| Model | Aceca | Munga |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 31 L |
