1956 AC Aceca vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Aceca | Calais |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 82 L |
