1956 AC Aceca vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Aceca weights approximately 124 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Aceca (168 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 1956 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Aceca | 102 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2160 mm |
