1956 AC Aceca vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (123 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Aceca (168 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1956 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 70.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2440 mm |
