1956 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 171 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.

Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Aceca (168 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (160 Nm). This means 1956 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

1956 AC Aceca 1996 Proton 400
Make AC Proton
Model Aceca 400
Year Released 1956 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 1834 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 123 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 160 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 894 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2510 mm