1956 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 936 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Challenger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2730 mm |