1956 AC Aceca vs. 1998 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1998 Toyota Celica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Celica weights approximately 201 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.

Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Aceca (168 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm). This means 1956 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

1956 AC Aceca 1998 Toyota Celica
Make AC Toyota
Model Aceca Celica
Year Released 1956 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 1762 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 123 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 154 Nm
Engine Bore Size 66 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 78 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 894 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1760 mm