1956 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 1999 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Isuzu Rodeo (205 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 738 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 1999 Isuzu Rodeo | |
| Make | AC | Isuzu |
| Model | Aceca | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 205 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1628 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |
